buying guidefitnessaccessories

Are Custom Insoles Worth It for Runners? A Practical Buyer's Checklist

ssmartwatch

2026-02-07

11 min read

A practical checklist to decide if 3D-scanned custom insoles will help your running — who benefits, what evidence to demand, and how to verify with your watch.

Quick answer: Maybe — but only if you measure it. A practical buyer's checklist for 3D-scanned insoles

Runners are sold on one promise: a custom insole will make your runs more comfortable, reduce injury risk, or make you faster. That sounds great — but it’s also easy to be sold placebo tech. In 2026, with companies like Groov pushing 3D-scanned insoles via phone cameras direct to consumers and a louder conversation about evidence-based wellness, the smartest move is to treat a purchase like an experiment. Buy only when you can test, measure, and verify using objective data from your smartwatch or foot power meter.

In this guide you'll get:

A simple checklist to decide if custom 3D-scanned insoles are a good fit for you
Exactly what evidence to ask for from a vendor (and what to distrust)
A step-by-step protocol to verify improvements using your smartwatch data
Cost-vs-benefit rules to decide when to spend on custom vs off-the-shelf insoles

Why skepticism matters in 2026

Late 2025 and early 2026 saw a surge of consumer-facing foot-tech: 3D foot scans via phone cameras, AI-generated orthotics, and DTC companies packaging personalization as a premium. The Verge published a skeptical piece in January 2026 noting that some 3D-scanned insoles feel like "placebo tech" unless backed by hard data and clinical validation (Victoria Song, The Verge, Jan 16, 2026).

"This 3D-scanned insole is another example of placebo tech" — Victoria Song, The Verge, Jan 16, 2026

That critique is useful: it reminds us to demand measurable outcomes. If a vendor can’t show you how they define success — or worse, asks you to rely only on subjective improvement — treat the purchase cautiously.

Who is most likely to benefit from custom 3D-scanned insoles?

Custom insoles are not one-size-fits-all salvation. Use this quick checklist to see where you fall:

Likely to benefit: Runners with chronic foot pain (plantar fasciitis, metatarsalgia), recurring knee pain thought to be linked to pronation or asymmetry, structural foot differences (significant arch height mismatch, rigid flat feet), high-mileage runners (50+ mpw) who need long-term load management, and athletes who have already tried quality off-the-shelf insoles without relief.
Maybe: Recreational runners seeking peak marginal gains — if you have a solid baseline and a plan to measure performance improvements (pace at given effort, running power). A targeted trial can show if the insole helps.
Unlikely to benefit: Casual runners (1–2 runs/week) with no pain, or those expecting a quick speed boost from a comfort product. If your shoe stack and biomechanics are fine and you have no symptoms, the marginal gain is often negligible.

Before you buy: the Evidence-to-Ask-For checklist

Ask the vendor these exact questions — get answers in writing or screenshots where possible. If the vendor stalls or provides vague marketing language, that’s a red flag.

What measurement method do you use? (3D scan, foam mold, pressure mapping, gait lab). A 3D foot scan alone is useful for shape but not for dynamic loading. Ideally a company combines a static 3D scan with dynamic pressure mapping or gait video.
Who interprets the data? Is a licensed clinician (podiatrist, physical therapist) involved in prescription and follow-up, or is it entirely algorithmic? Clinical oversight matters for injury-related claims.
Can I see the pressure map and gait report? Ask for before-and-after pressure maps (peak plantar pressure) and any symmetry or balance metrics the company records. Get raw files or screenshots.
Do you offer a trial or refund period? A legitimate vendor should offer at least a 30-day wear-and-run trial with a clear return policy — ideally 60–90 days for runners using the insoles in training.
Do you cite peer-reviewed evidence for your algorithm or shell design? Look for published studies, clinical trials, or independent lab tests. Marketing claims without citations are weak.
What materials and durability specs do you provide? Ask for the shell stiffness (e.g., Shore hardness), topcover materials, and expected lifespan in miles. Custom shells that break down after 200–300 miles are poor value for runners.
Can I compare my old insole to the new one? Request that the company documents differences (arch height, medial posting, pressure relief zones) and keeps a record of your specific prescription.

How to verify improvements using your smartwatch: a step-by-step protocol

Modern running watches from Garmin, Polar, Coros, and Apple (and foot pods like Stryd) give robust running dynamics you can use to test insoles. Here’s a repeatable protocol to verify a meaningful change.

Step 1 — Establish a baseline (2 weeks)

Run 6–8 sessions over two weeks on the same route(s) and similar conditions. Include one tempo run or threshold effort and one easy run.
Use the same shoes, time of day, and warm-up routine. Sync your watch and any foot pod (Stryd) and ensure firmware is updated.
Record these core metrics from each run: pace at given heart rate, average HR, HR drift, running power (if available), cadence, stride length, ground contact time (GCT), GCT balance (left/right), vertical oscillation, and perceived effort (RPE).
Take a baseline pain score (0–10) for any symptomatic area immediately after each run and the next morning.

Step 2 — Fit the custom insoles and document them

When you receive the insoles, photograph them in your shoe, and ask the vendor to provide the prescription notes and any pressure map or gait report.
Run a single light test run (20–30 minutes) to ensure comfort and no immediate new pain. Document this run as a "fit" session.

Step 3 — Repeat the same 2-week test with insoles

Repeat the exact same sessions (route, shoes, effort, time of day). This minimizes environmental variance.
Collect the same smartwatch metrics and pain scores. Keep a log of any shoe fit changes (e.g., you needed a half size larger or different lacing).

Step 4 — Compare objectively

Don’t rely on feelings alone. Use these thresholds to determine meaningful change:

Pain: A clinically meaningful reduction is usually 2+ points on a 0–10 scale sustained across multiple runs.
Ground contact time (GCT): Reduction of 10–20 ms and improved left/right balance can indicate more efficient loading. For many runners, a 5–10% reduction in GCT with no increase in perceived effort is notable.
Cadence & stride length: Changes within ±3% are likely noise. A purposeful cadence increase (2–5%) coupled with the same pace and lower HR can be positive.
Running power & pace at given HR: If running power decreases for the same pace and RPE, or pace increases at the same HR, that suggests improved economy. Use an external footpod (Stryd) for more consistent power numbers if your watch’s power estimate feels noisy.
Symmetry: If GCT balance shifts toward more equal left/right values, that can reduce injury risk in many cases.

Step 5 — Draw conclusions and follow-up

If you see consistent improvements across multiple objective metrics and pain reduction, the insoles likely provide benefit.
If only subjective improvement occurs (feels better but metrics are the same or worse), consider a blinded crossover trial (see below) or return the insoles.
If metrics worsen or new pain appears, stop using them and consult a clinician.

Advanced validation: how to run a simple blinded crossover trial

To rule out placebo effect — which is strong in footwear — try a blinded crossover. This is easy and powerful.

Get three insole sets: your regular insole, the new custom insole, and a neutral control (a generic cushioned insert of similar thickness). If the vendor won’t provide a neutral control, you can buy one.
Label them A, B, C (don’t look at which is which). Use each set for one week, with washes/out days between if possible. Run identical sessions and collect smartwatch metrics.
After the trial, unblind and compare objective metrics and pain scores. If the custom insole (once unblinded) outperforms the control and your baseline consistently, the effect is likely real.

Cost vs benefit: a practical decision framework

Prices in 2026 for 3D-scanned custom insoles vary widely — expect $100–$350 for DTC scanned models; clinician-prescribed custom orthotics from a podiatrist can run $300–$600+ depending on materials and lab. Here’s how to decide:

Low budget, no pain: Buy a good quality over-the-counter insole (Superfeet, Spenco, SOLE) and track for 4–6 weeks. If no benefit, you probably don’t need custom insoles.
Mid-budget, recurring pain: Consider a DTC 3D-scanned insole if the vendor provides a trial period, clinician review, and documented pressure mapping. This is a reasonable step before investing in expensive, custom lab orthotics.
Chronic or complex issues: If you have long-standing biomechanical problems, prior foot surgery, or multiple joint complaints, skip DTC and see a certified podiatrist or sports physiotherapist for a full gait lab assessment and prescription orthotic.

Common red flags vendors use — and how to push back

Vague claims like "improves performance" without metrics. Ask: what metric and how much change? Demand numbers, not adjectives.
Testimonials/photos only. Ask for de-identified case data (before/after pressure maps, GCT changes) and any independent testing.
No trial or refund policy. That suggests low confidence in repeatable results.
One-time fit with no follow-up. Good insole practice includes a follow-up check to adjust or tweak shells after 4–8 weeks of running.

Realistic outcomes you should expect

Set pragmatic goals to avoid disappointment.

Pain reduction: The most likely meaningful outcome for symptomatic runners. Expect improvement over weeks (not overnight). If your pain is neural (nerve-related) or systemic, insoles may not help.
Comfort & reduced hotspots: Many users report better comfort immediately; comfort is real but not necessarily a performance boost.
Performance: Marginal. Unless you’re optimizing a specific inefficiency (asymmetric GCT, poor arch support causing energy leaks), don’t expect big time gains. Small efficiency gains may show in running power or reduced HR at the same pace.
Injury prevention: Hard to prove for an individual. Use weekly training load management + objective symmetry improvements to make a case for reduced risk.

Case example (illustrative): How one recreational runner used a watch to decide

Case: A 34-year-old runner, 30 mpw, had recurring medial tibial pain on the right side. They bought a DTC 3D-scanned insole with a 60-day trial. Baseline: 2 weeks of runs showed right-side GCT 18 ms longer than left and a post-run pain score of 5. After fitting: a 6-week trial using the protocol above showed:

GCT balance improved from +18 ms right to +6 ms (more symmetric)
Pain score dropped from 5 to 1 consistently after runs
Pace at threshold heart rate improved by 6 seconds/km with same RPE

Conclusion: The runner kept the insoles. The objective smartwatch metrics matched subjective relief — a good outcome. This is the type of measurable win you should demand before committing.

Frequently asked practical questions

Q: Do I need a foot pod like Stryd?

A: Not strictly. Watches provide many useful metrics (GCT, cadence, VO2 estimates). But a foot pod like Stryd gives more consistent running power across shoes and terrain, which helps detect small efficiency gains. If you’re testing performance changes, use a foot pod.

Q: How long before I should expect results?

A: For pain: 2–8 weeks of consistent use. For performance metrics: measurable changes may appear in 2–4 weeks but allow 6–8 weeks for a robust sample size.

Q: Will insoles change my shoe fit?

A: Often yes. You may need a half size up or different lacing to accommodate thicker orthotics. Factor this into your trial runs.

Bottom line and actionable takeaways

Don’t buy on hype. Ask for dynamic data, clinician involvement, and a trial period.
Use your smartwatch like a lab. Baseline first, then run a repeatable 2–4 week protocol and compare GCT, symmetry, cadence, running power, pace at given HR, and pain scores.
Prefer vendors that share raw reports. Pressure maps, prescription notes, and clear refund terms are non-negotiable.
Run a blinded crossover if you suspect placebo. It’s simple and clarifies whether changes are real.
Cost strategy: Try a good OTC insole first; move to DTC custom if you have persistent symptoms; see a clinician for complex cases.

Final thoughts: Where the market is heading (2026 and beyond)

In 2026 the market is maturing: vendors are starting to pair 3D scanning with dynamic pressure mapping and app integrations that export data to watches and coach platforms. Expect tighter integrations between insoles and wearables in the next 18–24 months — but until then, the burden is on you to verify outcomes. Personalization can help, but personalization without measurement is just a premium placebo.

Call to action

Ready to decide? Download and print our one-page buyer’s checklist, run the two-week baseline with your watch, and follow the verification protocol above before committing. If you'd like, start with a free comparison of top DTC 3D-scanned insoles we evaluated in 2025–2026 — or sign up for our lossless checklist PDF and a template you can use to record smartwatch metrics during your trial.

Make your next insole purchase an experiment you can trust — your feet (and your watch) will thank you.

smartwatch

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.